Mother of Malaysian Property Bullies!! (6)

December 31, 2010                                                                                                                                      Our 6^th letter

 

 

Yang Amat Berhormat Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim     (khalid@selangor.gov.my)

Chief Minister of Selangor

Pejabat Menteri Besar Selangor
Tingkat 21, Bangunan SSAAS
40502 Shah Alam

Dear Mr Chief Minister,

 

Subang Jaya  & its Town Park

 

This confirms that we had not heard from you on our last five letters to you since 17/11/2010.

2)        Please note that silences will only be taken as an admission and not a rebut of what we had presented to you. Please be reminded that you have obligations to clarify the  discrepancies we have found on the title as well as the procedures you and other parties had gone through so far on our Public area under TCPA, NLC, PC (Penal Code), etc..

3)        We had also taken the efforts to seek clarifications from your subordinate departments concerned – such as JPDB, Appeal Board and Land Department. However, same goes silent. The Land Department has confirmed received our claim to Defeat the Title but denied and ignored the obligation to register the Claim on the Registry of the Title and to advise parties concerned so as to stop any further offenses, under TCPA, NLC, PC, etc.. At least there is an offense of PC 166 if continued to do so.

Should 2) & 3) happen in a CAT Government under your leadership?

4)        We wish to draw your attention that silence, will has no mean, to escape accountability. Legally, it will only give a stronger sign of desperate Breach of Duties under Penal Code with a more serious penalty when parties have duty to perform, prevent or protect. Any “new” person or party continues to act so will at least be accounted for Abetment and will be considered as having the same offense on the acts. The penalties could be accumulative if they are not stopped immediately.

5)        We believe legal accountability cannot be avoided in this case. And, we would like to present out view as follows:

a)        The alienation, as mentioned, is a kind of Misappropriation and Breach of  Trust by the Public Servant who has duty to perform prevent and protect. The offense is under PC 409 which carries a penalty of 2-20years + +.  The issue of the Title and other subsequent actions had made it an open misappropriation with NO DEFENSE available under PC 409A. 

b)        The alienation is without authority or jurisdiction resulting the issue of a Title which has at least caused the wrongful loss of the owners of Subang Jaya on having the Town Park and provide an excuse for Sime and MPPJ/MPSJ not to provide and maintain the Town Park.  It is FORGERY under 460 with possible penalty under PC 467 or 468 with   imprisonment of up to 20 years or 7 years respectively.

c)         When the Title is used as genuine, as in the case when Sime was/is applying for conversion/subdivision/development, PC 471 will be imposed. It will be considered of the same offense of making the forged document.

d)        All Departments concerning the Development, such as JPDB, PTG/PTP, MPPJ/MPSJ etc., are having copies of Master/Local Plans to provide the basis for decision whenever any application of conversion/subdivision/development comes. Sime had applied in several occasions since 1998 with the latest 2009/2010. Obviously, all Departments concerned has omitted to verify the status of the land and the title with the Plans, thereby had facilitated the use of the Title. We believe PC 166/167 will be applied to include 117/119 when Abetment is found

e)       We believe more offenses under PC, TCPA, NLC, LGA, etc., can be found and to include other parties who had claimed interest without the legal standi under TCPA, NLC, etc..

6)        Please see that PTG cancels or revokes the Title with our Claim registered.

7)        Please exhibit the Master/Local Plans of Subang Jaya with list of the Approval terms, preferably on a website. Gazette if necessary that the Plans constituted the Structural and Local Plan of Subang Jaya.

We will file our complaints with MACC and the Police if these are not done within TWO weeks with Public Announcement and an email to us.

We hope to see you Walk your Talk on providing CAT.

For Proprietors (under STA) in Subang Jaya

Cc:       Dato’ Adbul Nasir bin Hassan , Director, PTG

Dato’ Mohd Jaafar bin Mohd Atan – Director, JPBD Selangor

            Selangor Appeal Board – YB Dato’ Abu Bakar bin Awang and his Panels

            YB Lim Kit Siang, The People Parliament, TIM, NutGraph, MalaysiaToday,

YB Hannah Yeoh, Sinchew Daily, China Press, Malaysiankini, The Sun Daily, MalaysiaInsider,citizen-nades@thesundaily.com, crimewatchmalaysia ,

Free Malaysia Today,

            Subang Jayans        and those who have the Interest and Duty to receive

Mother of Malaysian Property Bullies!! (5)

2nd Letter in responds to reply from PTG

To: Dato’ Adbul Nasir bin Hassan  abdnasir@selangor.gov.my        2^nd letter

Re: Subang Town Park (Taman Subang Ria) – Title PN7210 to Sime UEP

DD:       24/12/2010

Cc:  YAB Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim – Chief Minister of Selangor
     Dato’ Mohd Jaafar bin Mohd Atan – Director, JPBD Selangor
     Selangor Appeal Board – YB Dato’ Abu Bakar bin Awang and his Panels
     YB Lim Kit Siang, TIM, MalaysiaToday, MalaysiaInsider, NutGraph,  China Press, Sinchew Daily, YB Hannah Yeoh,Malaysiankini, Free Malaysia Today,                   The Sun Daily, crimewatchmalaysia,
The People Parliament,  citizen-nades
Subang Jayans  and those who have the Interest and Duty to receive

=======================================================                  

Thanks your prompt reply to our email 24/12/2010 in respond to your confirmation of receiving our first letter dated 22/12/2010.

As mentioned earlier, we have foreigners. Therefore, your incoming has been translated for their understanding and input. We enclose herein for your modification, if necessary, to avoid misunderstanding. We do not include the Japanese and the Chinese that we had done.

PTG Incoming email – 24/12/2010

————————————————————————————–Tuan,

 Saperti yang dimaklumkan, emel Tuan berkaitan perkara ini telah diterima. Pihak saya hanya akan meneliti perkara-perkara yang berkaitan isu Tanah sahaja. Buat permulaan tindakan adalah secara dalaman (departmental)  dan pihak Tuan akan diberitahu sekiranya satu mesyuarat perlu diadakan.

2.   Mengenai permintaan Tuan supaya  tuntutan berkenaan   didaftarkan di dalam suratan hakmilik, saya ingin jelaskan tindakan tersebut tidak dapat dilaksanakan kerana ianya adalah tidak selaras dengan kehendak undang-undang Kanun Tanah Negara .

3.   Berhubung dengan  apa-apa isu lain yang melibatkan Lembaga Rayuan (Appeal Board), diharap pihak Tuan dapat berurusan terus dengan Pihak Berkuasa Perancang di Jabatan Perncang Bandar dan Desa  (JPBD) atau Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya.

Terima kasih.

Dato’ Abd Nasir Hassan

Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Selangor.

——————————————————————————————-

Dear sirs/madams,                                    (English Translation)

As mentioned earlier, we had received your email. I will only examine the matters related to land issues only. The action is internal among departments and will notify you if a meeting should be held.

2. Regarding your request to register your claim in the title, I wish to advise that it cannot be implemented because it is not in consistent with the legal requirements of the National Land Code.

 3. Regarding other issues involving the Appeal Board, please deal directly with JPBD and MPSJ. 

Dato’ Abd Nasir Hassan

Land Department of Selangor

———————————————————————————-

Our response as follows:

1.       Please advise which section of NLC you will be following in processing our claim? S 53 and S 13 for Open hearing?

a)          Land Title Department is statutory obliged to record any claim of an interest or restriction and advise parties involved and affected under S53. Such as cases of mortgage, assignment, in transaction, etc.

b)          The existing case is more, if not most, serious as it is a prima facie case of illegal issue of an invalid “private” title on public land to a Developer who has statutory obligation to surrender the land some 30 years ago as a Town Park. It is a Breach of Duty and Breach of Trust of PTG/PTP to allow sub-division and issue of Titles for Subang Jaya in 1970’s or 1980’s without taking back the land. To allow it to be under adverse possession and “illegal” alienation followed by an issue of title!  

c)          It is similar to the issue of forge banknote by the Bank himself, the First Party to the offense.

d)          The violation of S 122 is already sufficient to invalidate, revoke and cancel the title. But it comes also with violations of S 13, 43, 51, etc.. DO YOU NEED US TO PRESENT MORE BEFORE YOU WILL ACT PROMPTLY AND ACCORDINGLY?

 2)        Any title has to be issued with reference to the State Structural Plan and Local Plan. In this case, the Master Approvals of Subang Jaya (SS12-SS19) by JPBD/JPBK and MPPJ/MPSJ govern. Every Department concerned, (JPBK/JPBD, PTG/PTP, MPPJ/MPSJ, ….) has at least one set. PTG/PTP has no excuse to deny their not knowing the fact that it is on a piece of water retention pond designated as Town Park, a Public area under TCPA, LG, NLC, etc..

a)         The CM Press Statement has more or less confirmed that it was obtained by bribery.

b)         Other points presented in our first letter when putting the title, plans, leaflet, Sime Press Statement with sections and procedures of NLC together with historical events, it is also a case of collusion of frauds.

Therefore, our claim is under S59. Since it is a Public land, PTG/PTP owes the Public an answer. Where should the Town Park be, if Lot 17394 is not the one and where are those Other Space? Do you wish to continue with the Breach of Duty and Breach of Trust?

3.         PTG/PTP owe their existence under NLC. They are also a party to provide appraisal to what could be under the existing applications of Sime to the State, JPDB and MPSJ for land conversion, subdivision, development, etc. Do you think you have an excuse not to inform them? Especially when the Title is issued with obvious and serious violations of NLC where PTG, is the first party to the offense?

We have done more than we should in appealing to you with the respect of your being the Director of PTG.  The title is now under Approval/Decision by the State and MPSJ which could cause further damages to the authentic owners of the land, we, the Subang Jayans. The damage will extend to each and every Selangor Tax payer if the land is to be acquired.

We had provided you all the necessary substances for you to Revoke or cancel the title and investigate within your obligations and power. We do not bear the consequence of your failure NOT to do your job. It will be yours, PTG/PTP, and ALL those who had statutory, professional or moral obligations but failed to stop it and continue jeopardizing OUR Rights. We hope you are aware that any single title holder in Subang Jaya can initiate a case against all the violations related to this title, starting with PTG/PTP. 

4.         Please make sure our claim is also known to PTG Appeal Board as Sime, MPSJ and others could have made their appeals to PTG’s instead of, or, besides the JPBD’s in the coming 28/12/2010. We had requested all parties or authorities concerned to provide the Appeal Information to us as mentioned in our various correspondences since November. But so far we had not been provided as under TCPA, LGA or NLC. Why everyone prefers to go against the Laws under which they have statutory obligations leading to further offenses?

Being also the first party to our claim, please take this as our Official Demand for the cancellation or revoke of the Title and an explanation of when and how it happened. We express your immediate action on Registration of our claim and Point 4. Please advise when they are done. Our cc copies to some of those concerned also serve as a record that we have given our notice of complain or/and demand.

Have a nice weekend!

2nd Letter in Doc file

Mother of Malaysian Property Bullies!! (4)

Claim filed with Selangor State Land Department – PTG

December 22, 2010                                                                 abdnasir@selangor.gov.my

YB Dato’ Abd. Nasir bin Hassan
Director,
Selangor Land Department
Bangunan Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah
40576 Shah Alam
Selangor Darul Ehsan
Dear YB Dato’ Abd Nasir,

Subang Town Park (Taman Subang Ria)
Title PN7210 HSD 28054 Mukin Damasara – Lot 17394 alienated to Sime UEP Properties Bhd, 1987 [1]*

With due respect,

A.  Pursuant to Section 59 (a), of the National Land Code (Penang and Malacca), we are filing our application to defeat the Title on basis:

1) We are the proprietors in Subang Jaya (SS12-19) with Rights & Interest in the Public area, such as Town Park, of Subang Jaya Township, developed by Sime UEP Properties Bhd (previously known as United Engineering Properties Bhd) (herein referred as Sime) in 1974 or about.
2) We understand, it is part of the Water Retention Ponds designated as Town Park (Taman Bandar) under the Approved Master Plans of Subang Jaya since 1970’s. Same appears in various Approval plans in Wangsa Baiduri in 1986, 1990, 1994, 2003, 2006/7, etc.—————————-[2]
This violates the prohibition of issuing Title on Public area under NLC S 122 .
3) From the Press Statement of the Chief Minister of Selangor, we understand the Title was obtained via bribery————————————————————–[3]
4) The Title in [1]* was obtained from www.sj-ra.blogspot.com on 22/11/2010. It testifies
a) it was a Mukim Title amalgamated or merged from 6 lots, namely 983, 1073,1126,  3065, 3067 & 4246 of 29.39ha exceeding 4.047ha (violation of NLC S 43, previously S 146)
b) consists of LLN reserves and TNB Reserve  (violation of S 51) ——————–[2]
c) with Category empty (violation without any one of the three Categories for alienation)
d) pre-existing condition/restrictions  of Town Park (Taman Bandar) in Master Approval was misplaced as “taman recreasi dan bangunan yang berkaitan dengannya”
e) Lot 3067 was under PKNS to a joint-venture with Emko Properties Bhd in 1986 for the Wangsa Baiduri “Condominium” Project as in EMKO PROPERTIES SDN. BHD. V. LEE CHOONG KHENG NO. 24-540-1990,————————————————–[4]* 
f) Lot 3065 and Part pf Lot 3067 were designated as Town Park in the Master Approvals of Wangsa Baiduri in 1986. Same appeared in subsequent approvals of Spring Villa & Summer Villa (1990), Subang Meridian (1994), Subang Boulevard (reactivation of Subang Meridian from 17-storeys to 30-storey in 2003), Subang Boulevard II in 2007———[2]  Part of Lot 3067 only surrendered to the State in 1993 for passing to MPPJ in 1994.
g) Sime claimed that the alienation was done in 1987———————————–[5]
         
B.  It is Town Park in the Master Plan and “Taman Subang Ria” in UEP’s sales leaflet -[6]* Sime and MPPJ (now MPBJ) has contractual obligation to deliver the Town Park to those owners/purchasers in the area. In this respect, we request the Director to compel Sime/MPPJ to fulfill their obligation pursuant to S 59 b) to deliver the Town Park.

C. We understand some approvals or changes had been done without the necessary publicity under TCPA (Town & Country Planning Act) or/and without the openness under NLC that could bring the existence or/and changes to the Title. In this respect, we also wish to call upon our rights as under S 91 for the release of document of historic interest on the Title, such as the Master Approvals from JPBK/JPBD, MPPJ/MPSJ and records hold under PTG & PTP etc. to answer how this piece of land be subdivided and merged to give what it is today.

D. As owners and Proprietors under TCPA, LGA, STA and NLC, we believe our Rights on the Public area under respective sections in these laws also provide our Rights and the obligations of the Land Department or/and Land Office and the Trustee MPPJ/MPSJ to provide where about is the Public area of Subang Jaya and what had happened.

E. We understand Sime UEP Properties BHD, Tingkat 3, Wisma Tractors, 7, Jalan SS16/1, 47500 Subang Jaya will be affected and have obligations to answer.

We hope a Public meeting will be provided for C & D when A & B are to be done.

We hope to have our correspondences in English as we have quite a number of foreigners.

Please confirm email received of this official claim.
Owners/Proprietors in Subang Jaya
(under TCPA, LGA, STA and NLC) 
The Claimants
Cc: YAB Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim – Chief Minister of Selangor
 Dato’ Mohd Jaafar bin Mohd Atan – Director, JPBD Selangor
 Selangor Appeal Board – YB Dato’ Abu Bakar bin Awang and his Panels
 YB Lim Kit Siang TIM MalaysiaToday  MalaysiaInsider  NutGraph  YB Hannah Yeoh Malaysiankini  Free Malaysia Today  The Sun Daily   The People Parliament  crimewatchmalaysia  Sinchew Daily China Press
 Subang Jayans  and those who have the Interest and Duty to receive

=================================================
Attachments:
[1]*- Land Title-SJ Park-via SJRA-101122
[4]*- Emko Properties vs Lee Choong Kheng
[6]* – Subang Jaya Phase33-01 via RASJ-101122

Attachment [2]
Location Plan in MPSJ Approval in 2006- Town Park, Lots 3065, 3067, 983,1126 & TNB Reserve.
 Attachment [3] http://hannahyeoh.blogspot.com/2010/03/mb-releases-classified-information-on.html

PRESS STATEMENT

MARCH 17, 2010

MENTERI BESAR RELEASES CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ON
SUBANG RIA PARK

The State Executive Councillor (EXCO) meeting today agreed to declassify the minutes relating to the alienation of land in Subang Jaya, now known as Subang Ria Recreational Park.

The Selangor Menteri Besar had exercised his powers under Section 2C of the Official Secrets Act 1972 to release the minutes of an EXCO meeting held in 1987 so that the public is aware of the decisions made by the previous government on the matter.

The minutes revealed that United Estate Project Berhad (UEP), now known as Sime Darby UEP, applied for 72.64 acres of land in Petaling (now Subang Jaya) in 1986 for recreational purposes. The premium price for the land was tagged at RM4.95 million.

However, UEP had asked for a discount of the premium and the then Petaling District Land Office (Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Petaling) advised the State Government to consider the company’s request as UEP had already spent RM10 million to build recreational infrastructure on the land and that the area would be for recreational purposes. It was further stated that a valuer’s report submitted then stated that the land is only worth RM1.575 million and if this value is used, the premium owed would be much less.

It was then proposed that 10 housing units (nine semi-detached houses and one bungalow) said to be worth a total of RM2.7 million, would be purchased from UEP as an exchange for UEP’s land premium. This exchange concept (“konsep timbalbalik”) meant essentially that UEP would make its land premium payment in kind instead of in cash.

The houses would be surrendered to the Selangor State Government, and gazetted as residences for the Petaling District Assistant Officers (Penolong-penolong Pegawai Daerah Petaling) and the Petaling District Council Secretary (Setiausaha Majlis Daerah Petaling). All 10 houses are located in SS19, Subang Jaya. This proposal was approved by the then State EXCO.

It is hoped that this declassification clarifies the manner in which Sime Darby UEP obtained its land titles for the land at Subang Ria Recreational Park. The past Selangor State Government approved the alienation of land based on consideration in kind which essentially means that Sime Darby UEP is the valid title owner of the land as approved by the then State Exco.

Although the current administration questions the ethics of the decisions made then and would not condone such practice in its current administration, nevertheless these decisions are binding and has to be taken into consideration in future decision making regarding the issue.

Sime Darby UEP has since submitted proposals on development plans on the land and is currently being considered by the state. As the rightful owner of the land, the State cannot stop them from making development plans. However, the State will ensure that the residents will not be deprived of their designated green lung area for the community’s recreational use.

Development in Selangor will not be done at the expense of the rakyat and the State Government assures that all decisions will be made with transparency and accountability and in line with the State’s “Merakyatkan Ekonomi Selangor” agenda .

PRESS SECRETARIAT
OFFICE OF THE SELANGOR MENTERI BESAR

Attachment [5]http://www.sjecho.com.my/article/1126,

 

 

Mother of Malaysian Property Bullies!! (3)

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Open Appeal To:       Selangor Appeal Board         at  lrselangor@jpbdselangor.gov.my     First Letter PENGERUSI , Y. Bhg. Dato’ Abu Bakar bin Awang TIMBALAN PENGERUSI,  Y. Bhg. Tuan Hj. Nordin bin Sulaiman, AHLI PANEL LEMBAGA RAYUAN 1.    YB Dato’ Hj Azmeer bin Rashid   2.    … Continue reading →

Mother of Malaysian Property Bullies!! (2)

“SUBANG (JAYA) TOWN PARK” – Taman Subang Ria (in Malay) (1)                               Introduction

Garden City was a popular concept when come to Town planning in Malaysia. So, it is popular to name a residential area as Taman (garden) so and so. Taman Ria together should mean a pleasure garden and it should be translated as a Town Park when they are for the public. This ambiguity was used by the Government and the Developer to escape their responsibility in providing a Town Park in Subang for the last 30 years, even Taman Subang Ria was official in some documents. They prefer to call it Subang Ria Park than Town Park!!.

When Sime wants to use “their” title which was wrongly issued in 1995 with restriction to “Taman Recreasi”, it Is promoted as Subang Recreational Park since 2009. In fact,  it is the Landscaped area of the Water Retention Ponds designated as Town Park in Subang Jaya Master Plan in 1970’s. So, what recreational mean should be NOT MORE THAN a TOWN PARK!!

Subang Jaya Master Plan –(SS12-SS19)

Subang Jaya is a Township Development designed with the Concept of Garden City with Terms and Conditions laid down in the Master Plan approved in 1970’s  with 583 ha of land from Sime. Unless, there is inconsistence with the National, State or Local Plan of that time. the terms & Conditions should govern, especially on Public area laid out or appropriated under those Acts governing Town Planning –TCPA (Town & Country Planning Act, ,SDBA (Street, Sewage  &  Building Act), DA (Drainage Act, EA (Environment Act) and NLC (National Land Code), LGA (Local Government Act). Etc.

It specified the total number of units of different buildings (commercial, residential, Institutional, etc.) as well as Public area for Open Spaces and other Utilities  and a Population density of 7.6.

The Development was deemed completed in 1987. There should not be any additional Development, except for those facilities or Utilities that had not been provided by the State or the Developer. The Open Space and the Town Park are among the many that had been purposely left out, mishandled or even misappropriated. (More Details available)

 

Public Areas

They are the Common Properties of the parcel owners of the Town (Individual Title owners)  in the Custody of the Local Government. Therefore, they are not within the Jurisdiction of the State nor the Local Government for re-alienation or change. But, both have to see that the Terms & Conditions in the Master Plan of 1970’s be executed by parties concerned –namely, the Developers, Utilities providers (TNB…) and Agencies or Departments of the Governments. It is similar to the Common Properties/Facilities of Strata Property – such as a Condo or Apartment where unanimous vote is required if to change. Since it is impossible for a Town to have unanimous vote, therefore, even the State is excluded from further jurisdiction of change once it was set.

Open Space and Water Retention Pond – Under TCPA

They are among the essential conditions for Town Planning, especially for the size of Subang Jaya (583ha). The Guideline are 10% (58.3ha) for Open Space and 5% of Water Surface for Storm Management. The latter, when to account also the landscaping to separate and maintain the ponds, it can easily come to 10% of the Development.

Open Space under TCPA is interpreted as” public garden, park, sports and recreation ground, pleasure ground, walk or as a public place. There is a master 10% Open Space for the overall Subang to include facilities, such as Town Centre (=Town Hall) as well as 10% for each SS section to include a garden, or a playground  termed as  “Taman Bandar”.

Water Retention Pond is within “drainage” under “Utilities”. There should be four ponds in series for Subang to intake Storm Water, Sedimentation, flow-retarding, infiltration, etc..However, one had gone to PKNS in 1979 for “Joint-venture” in 1986 with Emko to “Develop” Wangsa Baiduri including the Spring Villa, Summer Villa, Subang Boulevard I & II. The 10% also applied in Wangsa Baiduri but ignored repeatedly by MPPJ/MPSJ & Emko.

They are the Public space to be hold in Trust by the State to be run by the Local Government.

Land Titles

During subdivision of the land to provide individual titles to those purchasers, the Master land title will be returned to the state to be passed to the custody of the  Local Government for their management with other Public Service and utility providers. Such as PWD (Public Work Department), DID (Drain and Irrigation Department), etc.. The Master Title should be marked with NO FURTHER ALIENATION and NO INDIVIDUAL TITLE for Public areas.

This explains why in August 2005, Selangor Town and Country Planning Department director Datin Paduka Dr Halimaton Saadiah Hashim had said that a mistake had been made when a separate title for Subang Ria Park was issued to the developer.  (More Details available)

 

Local Government

Only when these Public Areas come into the Custody of the Local Government then Assessment can be charged to those properties owners. However, lots of manipulations and misappropriation were found for the last 30 years. Among them, the infamous EMKO PROPERTIES SDN. BHD. V. LEE CHOONG KHENG

Mother of Malaysian Property Bullies!!

Wangsa Baiduri in the Town Park since 1986

Good Social Responsibilty by UEP??

Rocking Road, Rotting Roll!!

Rods along the Rots!!

Monsoon Rain Inlet

High Tension Cable Tower in

Looking at Federal Highway

An Open Theatre in Private Property?

Open Theatre in Private Properties?

Construction Before Public Hearing July 2007!!

A “Garden City” called Subang Jaya, south of Kulua Lumpur in the State of Selangor.

It was Sime Darby’s (previously known as Sime UEP or UEP)first Housing Project based on 583ha of land from its Seafield Estate (oil palm land). It brought Sime Darby its first FIABCI International Prix d’Excellence Award in 1995. 

However, working in glove together with the Government, Sime Darby is able to stay away from providing the Park and even issued with a private land tiltle in 1995. 

It is a typical “show case” in Malaysia Properties  bullies with side episode of the “famous Wangsa Bairdui Condominium Project by Emko Properties – the first “Gated Community”. With misappropriation of land and ignore of enforcement, the abuses continued for the last 30 years, non-stop up to today.

“Running dogs”, “Cats” sleeping with “Rats” are the games of all these bullies. A change of Government in 2008 has not brought in Remedy but providng hopes for more bullies!! Background, story of the rots and stains will be followed.